SparkFun Electronics Commentsurn:uuid:214d0e4e-f1b1-d287-ce26-ac5b4c9f82492024-03-28T03:32:02-06:00SparkFun Electronicsbboyho on Say Yes to the GNSSbboyhourn:uuid:a89a9b37-746b-0201-ff79-ecd55be9983e2022-09-06T15:13:01-06:00<p>Thanks for the feedback! I clarified under the product description of both the OpenLog Artemis versions with IMU and w/out IMU with the following changes:<ul>
<li>that it is supported as "<em>Any</em> u-Blox GPS Modules (Lat/Long, Altitude, Velocity, SIV, Time, Date) <em>such as</em>:"</li>
<li>updated the list of supported Qwiic products by adding the "MAX-M10S 1.5m Ultra-Low Power GPS"</li>
<li>included the "OpenLog Artemis" as a similar product under the "OpenLog Artemis (without IMU)"</li>
</ul><h3>​</h3><p>I also mirrored the changes to the <a href="https://github.com/sparkfun/OpenLog_Artemis#readme" rel="nofollow">GitHub Repo</a>. =)</p></p>
Customer #134773 on Say Yes to the GNSSCustomer #134773urn:uuid:4f72a6ba-e552-16ae-cac6-d1741d16be272022-09-06T12:36:51-06:00<p>Thanks for the clarification! I would suggest, though, that the list of supported Qwiic products on the OpenLog Artemis (without IMU) be updated, as there will be people who won't dig into the Hookup Guide before dismissing the combination.<p>Also, I'd suggest putting a link somewhere on the <a href="https://www.sparkfun.com/products/19426" rel="nofollow">SparkFun OpenLog Artemis (without IMU)</a> to the version <em>with</em> IMU <a href="https://www.sparkfun.com/products/16832" rel="nofollow">SparkFun OpenLog Artemis</a> -- maybe on the "similar items" list? Hopefully it won't be too long before you can keep both versions in stock (for my project, the IMU would have been superfluous). BTW, I noticed that the "with IMU" also would benefit from adding the new GNSS to the "supported list" in the description page.</p></p>
bboyho on Say Yes to the GNSSbboyhourn:uuid:bab95a3b-5f1d-96ef-72e7-afba9a639b0f2022-09-06T11:38:55-06:00<p>The OpenLog Artemis (with/without the IMU) supports any of the u-blox GNSS boards via Qwiic since they have the same I2C address and protocol. It's subtly stated in the <a href="https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/openlog-artemis-hookup-guide/introduction" rel="nofollow">OpenLog Artemis Hookup Guide: Introduction</a>:<blockquote>
<p>"Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) navigation data. The OLA can be linked to any of SparkFun’s u-blox GNSS boards allowing you to log accurate position, velocity and time data from..."</p>
</blockquote><p>Thus, the SparkFun GNSS Receiver Breakout - MAX-M10S (Qwiic) and any u-blox GNSS module should work with the Openlog Artemis through I2C. I also had the parts available and verified that the MAX-M10S can connect to the OpenLog Artemis (without IMU). I was able to view GNSS output and synchronize the RTC date/time with the GNSS receiver. ;)</p></p>
Customer #134773 on Say Yes to the GNSSCustomer #134773urn:uuid:22e45d71-a018-efd2-5b3a-b4fc673065ed2022-09-02T11:58:18-06:00<p>Even though my project is well beyond the point of choosing which GNSS receiver, I'll ask: Are there plans to support the <a href="https://www.sparkfun.com/products/18037" rel="nofollow">SparkFun GNSS Receiver Breakout - MAX-M10S (Qwiic)</a> to the <a href="https://www.sparkfun.com/products/19426" rel="nofollow">SparkFun OpenLog Artemis (without IMU)</a>? It would have been nice to use a longer antenna cable rather than a longer Qwiic cable...</p>