Member Since: January 6, 2010

Country: United States

  • I have to say that MicroCorruption is a really cool idea. I actually use the MSP430 for projects and it is neat to see the simulated environment they have put together. I’ve only gone through the tutorial and the first two challenges and… well, its pretty addictive.

  • You guys might consider stocking the RFD21813. I just ordered three from Mouser because I found out about them after reading this post. I would have much rather ordered them from SparkFun. While lacking a few useful things, like a low power receiver mode, they look to be very useful modules for mess and many-to-one sensor nets where high speed data rates aren’t needed.

  • This particular model only switches at the zero crossing of the AC input. This means that you would, at best, only have 120 PWM steps at a frequency of 1Hz down to three steps (0, 50, 100) at a PWM frequency of 60Hz. Each step would correspond to one half cycle of the AC input. For those with 50Hz power it would be 100 steps @ 1Hz and three steps @ 50Hz. It might work for incandescent lights, though I would expect you to perceive the flicker at half power with anything more than a few steps.

    The zero crossing switching is also why you can’t switch DC with these. Technically, you might be able switch DC if the zero crossing doesn’t require the output voltage to swing negative to switch, but it will behave quite oddly. The output would latch the current state of the input when DC is applied to the output and would stay that way until DC is removed from the output. If the input was ON when DC is applied, then DC would flow so long as it is applied to the output, regardless of changes to the input. If the input was OFF when DC is applied, then DC wouldn’t flow regardless of input change. Depending on the design of the zero-crossing detection circuit, you might be able to switch PWM’d DC so long as your PWM signal off width was long enough for the zero crossing to be detected and so long as the zero crossing circuit doesn’t require the voltage to go negative to trigger.

  • No need for razor blades. Just use APC electric props. They are pretty near razor sharp at the tips to begin with. Given what one will due to a finger, I doubt a balloon would stand a chance.

  • You can make your own. Check out Pilkington Mirrorview and Mirrowpane. You can also get acrylic two way mirrors that are cheaper though harder to make look good at large sizes. Put LCD panels on the back side and their you go.

  • First thing I went to find out was “how much for the clock?” sigh $500 is well outside the range for an impulse buy, but I would love one. Although, ½ meter might be a better size.

  • Just a note. Your Fritizing diagram is missing the ground connection between the PCA9306 and the pro mini.

  • I’m of a couple of minds here. Anything that get people (kids or adults) interesting in programming and electronics is good in my opinion. Anything that makes it easier for someone to implement an idea they have for a widget, piece of interactive art, automatic cat herder, or whatever you have cooked up is also good. Things like visual programming and arduino certainly facilitate interactive art and such things and open up the world of custom algorithm implementation to none programmers. It does not make you a programmer. Actually, I consider a programmer to be a step below in the talent spectrum. All you need to do to “program” is learn the language syntax, whatever the language. Visual programming focusing on algorithms or program function.

    My big beef with visual languages, and even the move to higher and higher level languages is that it makes it easy to accomplish things in a bad way and so we end up with multi-ghz processors being needed to flash a few LEDs. I’m thinking of the penchant for using Raspberry Pi’s in place of arduinos because you can run in a normal Linux OS environment. That’s fine for some hobbyist at home, but it works its way into the commercial environment and suddenly your toaster has to run embedded linux so a two bit java developer can write the code that lets your burn your bagel in the morning….

  • I need a US source for a replacement cable. Apparently the cable strongly resembles a cat toy as I found mine, with camera attached in our laundry room when I got home. There are holes punched completely through the cable. Any suggestions?

  • Yep, FGPA’s are hard. You are working at the absolute lowest level of computing hardware possible. It is equivalent to connecting 74LSxx parts with jumper wires on a bread board. Add to that the fact that timing matters immensely and you have a complex, and difficult to learn environment. Learn async digital logic. Learn synchronous digital logic. Work your way up the ladder. When you understand why most FOR loops in Verilog cannot be synthesized, then start more complex stuff. Sometimes concepts are hard for a reason and not everybody gets them. That’s ok. Sometimes, something that looks cool takes a lot of work, maybe more work than you want to put into it. That’s ok too. In reality, if you are looking for high level programming constructs to put down large blocks of functionality on an FPGA, you don’t don’t need and FPGA. You need a microcontroller.

No public wish lists :(