Member Since: March 22, 2010

Country: United States


EE with over 30 years experience designing opamp circuits, sensors, amplifiers, servos and safeties.

  • The data-line resistor prevents transmission line overshoot, if at the driving end. The 1000uF capacitor likely has ESR to diminish the connection transient, if located at the load end (only makes it worse at the battery end). Neither improvement addresses >6VDC supply voltage. Regulated voltage with limited current is indeed the way to go.

  • I will offer a caution regarding this design. It is shown with 4 AA cells in series, directly connected to the LED strip power. The WS2812 LED spec sheet list the rated voltage as “+6.0 ~+7.0”. Four new AA cells can add up to > 6.0V, so there is already a risk of damage. Worse, there will be a plug-in transient, when the wiring inductance builds up a large current charging the 60 ceramic caps of the strip, causing an overshoot theoretically to as much as double the battery voltage. In the circuit depicted, the wires are short, limiting overshoot. Adapting the design to use longer wires would increase the damage risk. I broke a WS2812 strip in this way. Full protection can be had by regulating the strip supply to 5V. Mitigation only of the transient can be achieved by adding even a fractional-ohm resistor in series with the strip supply.

  • It might have been a good time to check the aged electrolytic capacitors in the Marantz. They can lose capacity over time, compromising peak power, distortion and line-hum suppression.

  • In the mid-70’s, an audio seminar by the late Dr. Richard Greiner compared the schematics of the Phase-Linear 400 Watt amplifier to the competing Marantz 400 watt. The P-L amp was a straight-forward class A-B differential design on one page. The Marantz went on for several more pages of circuitry, much of which was devoted to Inter-Modulation-Distortion suppression. That kind of distortion introduces frequencies which are not harmonics of the source signal, and so are particularly aggravating. The audiophiles must have dominated the bean counters at Marantz in that era.

  • It should be normal practice, when offering a product with connectors, to either stock the mates or provide a link to a source or at least an industry part number. I can’t use this without the mating connectors, delaying a purchase from you.

  • I used a certain pulse generator capable of giving me an On-Off-On signal to control a high current PMOS FET switching a high current battery source. The high currents can also flow from an adjustable supply with an output cap >> the DUT input cap. I adjusted the On and Off times looking for switcher misbehavior. Things to look for include output voltage overshoot and high slew rate of the input cap, indicating over-current. These stresses result from millisecond Off times, but only exist for microseconds. It is quite possible for the DUT to survive wounded, only to become a failure later. At least one previous employer mandates this test as part of new product DVT.

    It would make better sense to use a micro-controller with a level shifter to drive the PMOS, so you could even sequence the times while watching or frame-sequence-storing the behavior.

    The series-resistor option for input spike-taming (a separate problem than the On-Off-On issue) has some notes: – It obviously must be rated for the RMS input current maximum of the system. – The current spike connecting to a battery can be double-digit Amps, so R must be pulse-rated. Tiny metal films might erode. Composition types are more robust. – The R value depends on the system wiring inductance and input capacitance. I’ve recommended 1 ohm for applications in the upper half of the input rating and had good results, but optimal for this or other systems may vary some. Sometimes I test for the minimal R capable of limiting to a safe spike peak, with the worst case maximum wire length and the source and return leads separated.

  • Although the described circuit adequately clamps the Vin spike, it requires 3 parts, 2 of them semi-conductors. Also, the scope shows 3,000,000 V/sec ramp rate on a 10uF cap, indicating a current of 30 Amps that the FET must divert, assuming the cap ESR is near zero. In some applications, the same spike remediation can be achieved with a small resistor of an ohm or even less. The resistor can be either inserted in series with Vin, at a small loss in run-time efficiency, or only in series with the 10uF cap, costing some input voltage ripple due to switcher current draw. Another subtle hazard when plugging a switcher to a battery is the risk of certain make-break-make contact bounce intervals that can partially charge the switcher output cap, stall during the break, and re-commence charging at the next make. If the soft-start function does not re-engage, the final charge can be violent enough to cause over-current damage to the switcher or voltage over-shoot damage to the powered components. Not all switcher types are susceptible, but it’s worth checking for in design, especially as this cause is hard to diagnose on returned units.

  • Primary protection against electric shock is provided by the resistors in series with the arm and leg leads. SF should confirm that those resistors also are rated for >36V insulation resistance and that the clearances of the leads are sufficient for that voltage. Although SF customers are generally savvy, my rule for design of such devices is that they should not conduct even if an idiot user touches 120V and the device is earth-grounded.

  • I must disagree with other posters' enthusiasm for McGuckin Hardware. My mistreatment at the hands of their security, when I had stolen nothing, was not just unprofessional, it was un-American! As a former store detective, I say so from experience. SF is blameless for associating with them, but I will not attend.

  • A PCB was being calibrated on a pogo-pin vacuum tester, but was not repeatable and passed PCBs failed in system. It turned out unequal forces on the (large) board could generate piezoelectric currents in a high-impedance node, sufficient to swamp the cal. This could show up today testing designs using modern accelerometers or cap sensors. (The solution at the time was foam pads under the unsupported areas).

No public wish lists :(