Please see all COVID-19 updates here as some shipments may be delayed due to CDC safety and staffing guidelines. If you have an order or shipping question please refer to our Customer Support page. For technical questions please check out our Forums. Thank you for your continued support.

Member #1272652

Member Since: February 5, 2018

Country: United States

  • Would the next mission robot be named "Satisfaction", as in "Satisfaction brought him back?" 😁

  • I have a sad association with the K400 Plus, because when it came out it worked with my Mac mini, then support was dropped. I think there was technical issue after an OSX update, and for some reason they didn't amicably negotiate a driver update. This was shocking for me because back in the mid 90s, Logitech was pretty much Mac-only accessory company. I believe they became very successful branching out into making PS/2 PC mice, but this was like seeing an old couple break-up. It does work with Android and AFAIK everything else, I'm sure there are no issues with any Raspberry distros.

  • I imagine that, once connected by USB and SSH, RPi Zero is just like an additional peripheral, or maybe I should say it's like the RPi has a full screen(withGPU) and keyboard, even if airgapped before connecting to micro:bit. One thing MakeCode kind of impressed upon me is that for general programming, the specific hardware, or OS, is becoming less important than a good 'net connection. I think it can even be done on an Android phone.

  • You can receive transmissions without a license. I also want to respond to TheseusRex: All of FCC Enforcement Bureau Special Counsel Laura Smith’s warning notices concluded with the advisory: Fines normally range from $7,500 to $10,000. So, I'm not so sure it's "guaranteed ten grand", and several warning from official operators and Special Counsel will proceed any legal action. Why do ham operators seem to be so fond of "mansplaining" their hobby?

  • As I understand it, a license is not needed when strictly receiving transmissions. Also, members of the Amateur Auxiliary (Official Observers) will give three or more warnings before contacting officials, who will send warnings of their own before pursuing legal actions. Basically anyone who inadvertently starts transmitting without a license does not have to worry about the Ham Police breaking down their doors! Not to mention, an item that starts at $1400 before other necessary equipment is unlikely not to know what they're getting into. One thing that's kept me away from Ham radio is that I have come across members that are quite patronizing. There seems to be a nerd snob factor in the community.

  • I don't think so, that might be a fun project, though. ;) I'm sure there's plenty of potential cross pollination with Adafruit projects and CircuitPython, and I assume projects coming from Great Britain and the BBC. I, for one, am going to look around, or, if short on time, buy a RedBot board, which is, after all, what I would expect SparkFun to concentrate their efforts on. They are not really a software company, after all, and it would be a bit counterproductive to work on micro:bit while they are distributing RedBot kits.

  • Are you reviewing the "Arduino Industrial 101?" what did you think "industrial" meant.

  • No. I had reservations about the Arduino 101 (A project of Intel as much as Arduino with a x86 Quark chip) Definitely don't mess with the "industrial version." Yun has a linux System-on-a-chip microprocessor. It is a complete sub-microcomputer. (maybe they'll start calling them picocomputers?) Other Arduinos are based on microcontrollers. You cannot run linux on an Arduino Uno, for example. (nor would you want to). If you want to attempt projects like home video servers or video game emulation; projects that require very little knowledge of electronics, where you can solve more problems with software, I'd go with the Raspberry Pi. If you want to learn about circuits and sensors, and electronics in general, you want to go with Arduino. Both of them are good for learning programming, but RPi more for something like web scripting, or interfacing with PC and small networks. Arduino is for programming appliances, robots, etc. The Holy Grail is combining the two in the Internet of Things, and Arduino 101 is an example of one failure to do that Yun (and imitations) is also a combo attempt, I'd say if you were already invested in Arduino, and were familiar with Arduino "Hats," Yun would be the way to go, and quite reasonably priced as far as what it is capable of doing.

  • The thread actually confuses the issue more than it clarifies. You're quote, and the rest of the thread specifically addresses the Arduino 101. The representative doesn't address this part of the question "tinyTile descriptions says it's possible, but in schematics there is no charging circuitry connection even after moving resistor R15 to R17 as advised". So... it's still possible? Also, the boards are perhaps designed to train students, and encourage professionals to use x86 embedded. When you say, "likely to be used," I think you're talking about hobbyists, or students who wish their projects stand up to more than one or two demonstration uses, or even none, as long as it gets a decent grade. Raspberry Pi's are generally better for this, and while perhaps not very robust, their price makes them more replaceable. I think Intel may be short sighted- but it wasn't too long ago that single board computers were strictly for developers, not hobbyists, and their price tag reflected this.

  • Before "Open Source" was a thing, "Open" meant: vendor-neutral technology standards and certifications. As in work done by the Open Group, which certifies Unix, etc. etc. with a membership of over 500 companies. I don't think the original poster went to back to edit his comment; but as it is now, he uses the phrase "VERY proprietary." There is a large spectrum between suing every possible threat for possible trademark infringement, and CopyLeft, which theoretically should be as legally enforceable as Copyright, but in reverse. Actually Open Source groups recognized the subtleties when they rejected Gnu Free Software restrictions and accepted MIT licenses and BSD licenses, etc. I'm still grateful for "Free Software" zealots, as they fight for things like non-proprietary boot firmware, which RPi unfortunately has, as almost every PC. I'd like to see Libre Computer Boards at Sparkfun. I hope they catch on.