EternityForest

Member Since: April 17, 2010

Country: United States

Profile

Spoken Languages

English Learning Nihongo(japanese)

Programming Languages

Visual Basic Visual Basic .net Normal Basic PHP(i love that language) EXSE(open source language i designed)

Websites

http://eternityforest.wordpress.com/

  • I believe that the SZ series might have a compatible part, but it is only available from one distributor on octopart, and there is no CAD symbol I've seen, or even any pictures available besides the mechanical drawings.

    I'd love it if SFE had those, with a compatible footprint. I don't trust my hand soldering on these.

  • Does this provide 5v power via a Qwiic connector?

    If so, maybe there should be a little symbol that makes the 5V one more obvious, if you're gonna use the same connector for 5v stuff, or maybe a switch or a jumper should be required to enable 5v output.

    You could even have a "5v is on" LED!

  • I wonder if the Qwiic connector could be extended to allow analog peripherals by specifying "No device may source current with less than 4.7kohm impedence or more than 3.3v".

    That way devices might not work if you plug i2c and non-i2c together, but it also would likely not break things.

    I love the idea of a standard I2C connector, but I also like the idea of a standard simple connector for power+a GPIO or two.

  • What's the float voltage of this thing? They say every 0.1v reduction doubles lifespan in li ion.

  • What is really needed is some kind of hobbyist oriented equivalent of USB. The beauty of vernier is the plug and play compatibility. We need a standard way for a device to say "I am a sensor, I output the temperature and humidity". We need to get devices talking to each other. If something can be networked, it never really gets obsolete. There's always a part for it to play in a larger system. USB is great for keyboards and mice and all the other stuff USB is used for. But we need something open. Something cheap to implement. Something that anyone can make a device for without buying a VID. Something with a bus topology instead of a point to point with hubs. Preferably something all-digital. Something with decent range. Think of the possibilities if hobbyists agreed on a standard protocol that projects should speak. Then there would be a system like vernier, but with hundreds of modules available!

  • Im pretty sure light going in the sides wont go along the fibre and out the end, If it was that easy we wouldnt need those special light concentrating fibres that some university is doing for cheap soar power supposedly

  • There are so many good uses for this. But i agree, you could hurt yourself in short order.
    Remember to always use multiple redundant safety resistors and don't use anything connected to AC mains unless you know what your doing. really. just don't. if you must,be sure the output is isolated!!!
    anything across the chest or head is a dangerous(unless its a sensor not a shocker)
    but otherwise, great product!

  • I believe to infringe a product need only have all the elements of ONE claim. i think each claim is legally enforceable independent of any other claims.

  • The question about battery charge time should say "in theory" or "Under ideal conditions" because inefficiencies would most likely extend the charge time a little.
    Other then that, i got them all pretty much right except for a few of the number format conversions.
    Great Quiz SparkFun! Thanks!

  • @Ad
    I don't see any problem with your setup at all.
    But i would like to point out that if you use a SPI connection, you are always "writing" something to the sensor(the clock line of course) so the precautions are needed.

No public wish lists :(