Track My Order
Frequently Asked Questions
International Shipping Info
Mon-Fri, 9am to 12pm and
1pm to 5pm U.S. Mountain Time:
Chat With Us
August 7, 2010
News - Enginursday: Innovative T…
about a month ago
7 issue areas i see
1) Regulator tab lands are small, i would enlarge and add vias to a bottom plane to distribute any heat. Though current is low as you say, alway make room for a daughter board with higher current requirements. Guaranteed, Murphy will get you here.
2) Copper flow under Mounting Screws, should add restrict unless they are specifically to carry the GND thru the screw.
3) BOTTOM Right, via under mounting screw, depending on the screw head type this can be an easy short
4) BOTTOM Left, resistors are too close to mounting screws, blocked silkscreen and an invitation to screwdrive damage when mounting screws are put in place.
5) MOSFETs ; these can readily get caught on things, if V1 and V2 leds were shifted between, lay them face down and heatsinking can also me added if future requires. Another approach is mount them underneath and there is better visibility of V1 & V2 leds and since on standoffs still heatsink room. Alternative, with minor movement go to SMD mosfets.
6) Serial Header; these will break loose very easily, best go to thru pin or at least reenforce the mounting some way.
7) Tants; as a rule i stay away from Tantalum caps, they come with too many issues. The largest i see is 10uF and these are available in ceramic or Elect.
your LD1117 i note are ST’s 800mA but have a 1V regulation drop out point. I like Microchip’s, it is an identical footprint but has a .2v regulation drop out and in testing i found run a bit cooler under load.
There aren’t any Test Points. Often testing will require verifying the supply voltages and other points.
News - ATP: Hall Effect and Lore…
about 7 months ago
did it in college 45 years ago and worked.
to make it work i used;
A bar magnet worked best due to shape of the field. Field shape and alignment will be critical.
To get around possible induction I made an adjustable wooden holder (glue only) so the magnet would not be moving and carefully taped down all wires out to 6 inches.
Once done the OP amp produced a steady offset proportional to the current and the distance of the magnet.
Proving changing distance worked.
The math from these measure followed Lorentz law as expected.
As a secondary proof of the field to current ratio;
I made a saw tooth oscillator for the current source and you could see the ramp on the scope from the OP amp output. Showing the effect of changing current. My prof really liked that idea.
No public wish lists :(
Forgot your password?
No account? Register one!