OhmMyGadgets

Member Since: January 13, 2012

Country: United States

Profile

Role

Design Engineer - Advanced Motion Controls / Owner, Design Engineer - OhmMyGadgets

Spoken Languages

English, Spanish, (precious little) Mandarin

Programming Languages

C++, assembly

Universities

BSEE California State University, Northridge

Expertise

Microcontrollers, LED lighting, DMX-512, RC servos, industrial motion control

Interests

Halloween, animatronics, lighting, motorcycles

Websites

OhmMyGadgets

  • News - According to Pete - Analo… | last year

    Yes, filters are the way to get rid of the noise. Consider the frequency range you’re interested in measuring, and make sure the filter you design falls well above that frequency range.

    You can use RC filters, or even better, an active filter (opamp filter). Like Pete showed in his diagram, ADCs have sampling capacitors that need to charge quickly to the voltage you’re measuring. If you have too much resistance from your source (like, through the resistor in your RC network), the capacitor may not charge up all the way during the acquisition time, which results in some measurement error. On the other hand, if you’re feeding the ADC with the (low impedance) output of an opmap, you don’t have to worry about that.

    There are also ways of filtering in software. As long as you’ve applied enough hardware filtering to avoid aliasing, you can use a digital filter as well. Look up IIR filters, to get some ideas.

    Stand alone ADCs will usually have much better specs than integrated ADCs. Higher precision (number of bits), better internal voltage references (accuracy), and faster sampling rates. See what you can get the Arduino to do for you, and if you end up bumping your head on these limitations, you can always add the external ADC later.

  • Product KIT-11588 | last year

    Hey! I see LEDs connected to collectors! Cool :-) It looks like the links to the design files are still pointing to the v12 revision, though.

    I know this is a little late… but if you guys ever end up reving it again, consider rotating the LEDs 90 degrees, so they can be bent in and out. I put a similar design on Batch PCB a year ago, for Medusa DMX users. The ability to bend in and out makes it easier to converge the light from the 3 LEDs, especially if they’re not soldered in quite straight.

  • News - Modkit Micro | about 2 years ago

    I met these guys at MakerFaire a few years ago. It’s good to see them finally taking off. I like the idea of visual programming for would-be tinkerers who don’t know how to program. Maybe my dad will finally try it.

  • News - June Caption Contest | about 2 years ago

    High five, and Asimov jive!

  • News - New Product Friday: Will … | about 2 years ago

    Are the outputs on the spark gap igniters isolated from the inputs, or are the in/out grounds electrically connected to one another? If they share a common ground, it might be worth it to try separate isolated 5V supplies for the different segments.

  • News - Maker Faire San Mateo 201… | about 2 years ago

    Have they started charging for non-selling booths now, too? I’m going only as an attendee this year, but I had a free booth last year for the Medusa board.

    I do remember talking with one of the organizers, and being surprised the booth was free. She impressed upon me how much the faire was really about the makers, not about pulling in dough, and said they charge for the selling and corporate booths in order to restrict the faire from becoming an overly commercial event, squeezing out would-be small presenters. I’m a skeptical kinda guy, so I would wonder whether that were really the intent at the corporate level. Regardless, she sounded pretty sincere about it. At the same time, though, I think SparkFun ought to have some kind of special dispensation, given how much of their layout is dedicated to education, rather than product. Hands-on is what Maker Faire is all about, after all.

    Regardless, I’m damn glad the Maker Faire exists. I’d never seen anything like it, when I first attended. And, heck - I got to meet Nate and Pete last year :-D

  • Product KIT-10111 | about 2 years ago

    Just found out about this, from the news of the retail packaging. I’m curious… had you guys considered putting the load on the collector side? With the LED and drop resistor on the emitter side, the delivered current will be dependent on the voltage from your microcontroller. With a 5V micro, you’d have 5V at the base, ~4.3V at the emitter. But with a 3.3V micro, you’d only have ~2.6V at the base, which wouldn’t even turn on the Blue or Green LEDs. But if the LED and drop resistor were on the collector side, the current would be (more or less) independent of driving voltage.

    I made a very similar board for Halloween lighting, and posted it to batchpcb a few months ago. I did quite a bit of testing using 10mm 1W LEDs. One thing you may find, is that the Vf changes as the LEDs warm up. This may be causing some of the deviation you were seeing

No public wish lists :(