Member Since: May 25, 2008

Country: United States

  • As you experiment, you might try using grout (as in tile grout) in the place of concrete. It’s easy to buy in smaller quantities and it comes in a variety of colors. Also, note that concrete is prone to cracks and in most cases should include some sort of reinforcement. For tiny little projects it may not matter, but for anything large, you would want some steel in there somewhere. Lastly, I’ve seen some pretty cool results with casing optical fiber into concrete.

    If you are literally going to take your designs and “cast them in stone”, then I would suggest a modular approach, where the individual modules are “cast in stone” and can be replaced with new modules. If you cast everything in stone and a component dies, you are pretty well done.

  • On second thought, perhaps this is a better solution:

  • Seems like the thing to do would be to build the LEDs into the toilet seat itself, perhaps with a little epoxy to isolate the electronics from the moisture, chemicals and waste products.

  • You missed a category: Building Management Systems. Around the US there are probably 50,000 or more buildings with HVAC, lighting, security, etc controlled by BMSs. With careful attention to the gigabytes of data that come from such an installation, a building owner can tune their building to use considerably less energy and detect maintenance problems before they get to the point that a system comes down. Companies are already saving millions of dollars on energy and maintenance with BMSs and it will only get better as the cost of BMSs for smaller buildings come down in price and monitor even more aspects of a building. Eventually, this sort of thing will trickle down to the residential markets, especially for new construction.

  • Um, no, your light bulb is not an attack vector. Your Philips Hue base station, maybe, but the light bulbs speak Zigbee, not TCP/IP, so there is no path into or out of them from anything remote (sorry if I’m being pedantic and you meant it as a joke, but people all over are saying the goofiest things about IoT).

  • So, if I’m reading your estimates right, we the people contributed $195,000 towards your solar array (via a federal rebate)? And even so, the investment isn’t more profitable than putting the money into some other average investment?

    Um… awesome.

  • Hmmm… I guess so. I always just use a coin cell.

  • Parity bits aren’t used much because there’s nothing to do about the error. The hardware layer isn’t that useful of a spot to catch the error. These days, errors are usually detected at a higher layer, where a resend can be requested. The UART counts the 1-bits in the message, the parity bit is then used to make the total even or odd, depending on how it’s set. It’s not particularly good at catching errors, either. Parity was just a bad idea and that’s why no one uses it any more (well, I’m sure SOMEone does).

  • You might want to google “markov chains”. The trick to getting nice sentences out of the thing is to pick random words, but only random words that tend (in normal english sentences) to come after the word you’ve just picked. It might take more than the processing power of the arduino in question, however.

  • I don’t know if this would produce enough electricity to be worth the power company’s time. Lance Armstrong can produce about 500 watts. If you lined up 10 Lance Armstrongs and got them to pedal for eight hours, that would be 40 kWh. That’s less than five bucks worth of power in an average market.
    How about a better model: let people plug in their phones and laptops and iPods and charge them up? That way you don’t have to deal with bureaucracy of the power company and people can get an immediate, personal benefit. Plus they can go the rest of the day with that smug, holier than thou feeling, knowing their phone is “green” powered.

No public wish lists :(