SparkFun Electronics will be closed in observance of memorial day on Monday, May 29th. We will resume normal business hours on Tuesday, May 30th. Any orders placed after 2pm Mountain Time on Friday, May 26th will process and ship out on Tuesday, May 30th.

Member #444741

Member Since: June 7, 2013

Country: United States

  • answered my own question… The datasheet shows a filter in fig42 with 33uH & 1uF on each output lead. Optional of course. Sheet says it may improve battery life a bit. By less than factor of 2 I guess.

  • It seems to me a series inductor then a shunt capacitor right near the PCB could suppress that RF interference. Could anybody suggest particular values? Is 10uH & 1uF enough?

  • I suspect this unit scans from short delay/distance to longer, looking for correlations. It looks like it stops and reports the distance as soon as it decides it had found a correlation, but it won’t keep scanning after that. Maybe it could scan for multiples if reprogrammed internally; maybe with the mfr eval board? Then there would be fuzzy limits between smeared and distinct responses…

  • I think water is a pretty difficult target. It has lower index-of-refraction than most other things, so it reflects less than half of what a window reflects. The new datasheet says ‘no washing, it’s not sealed’ for the soldering process , so I think living full-time inside a fluid tank is highly unguaranteed. Spending power to keep it always 5-10c warmer than the environment might help.

  • I think a clear fluid in a white or metallic container would have serious difficulties. Making the container black would help, and having a fluid that was dark or densely pigmented would help too. So I doubt this works great for water or gas-tanks. Measuring distance to a white float would be needed.

No public wish lists :(