Please see all COVID-19 updates here as some shipments may be delayed due to CDC safety and staffing guidelines. If you have an order or shipping question please refer to our Customer Support page. For technical questions please check out our Forums. Thank you for your continued support.


Member Since: September 22, 2008

Country: Greece

  • I would like to recommend (suggest) a pcb redesign of this board so that it will include the two smalls hole that the SF1 filter require. And a second thought is to (optional) include a RJ45 socket. In case someone wants to physical place inside a radiation shield, and if used with the USB weather board, then i can also suggest a RJ45 socket addition at the USB weather board, in order to connect to.

  • Looking for the way the rain gauge works, i think there are two options:

    a) Each change a tiping bucket makes a short pulse, so with the pull up resistor we have, it makes a pulse from logic 1 to logic 0 and back to logic 1. Then the circuit we all use is correct.

    b) Each tiping bucket position makes either logic 1 or logic 0. So, since we use a pull up resistor, we count only the change of logic 1 to logic 0. After a change from 1 to 0, and after more rain, the gauge will change to logic 1 (this will NOT increase microcontroller's rain counter) and then, after more rain, the gauge will change to logic 0 (this will INCREASE microcontroller's rain counter) .So, we are only counting changes of logic 1 to logic 0 and NOT counting changes of logic 0 to logic 1. Do we miss some rain, this way? The question: If this is the way to gauge reed relay works, why not connect the rain gauge to a microcontroller port with interrupt on change capability and count both changes???

    I am asking that, since i also saw the recent change in the Sparkfun's weather shield board software (after a user's real work measurents). I mean the increment of the rain value of each pulse.

    So, with which way it works?

  • I would like to come back to the issue of wind speed sensor.

    Since the sensor makes two pulses for a full revolution, there was a small issue about the way of calculating wind speed.

    I mean either use a pulse or two pulses for calculating a wind speed of 1.492 MPH (or 2.4 km/h).

    So, is there any verification about this?

  • Thanks Mike,

    So, my sensor is not broken. It is normal to make two pulses per one full circle. Your answer made me relief!

    For the history: For anemometer i used 10K resistor pull up and a 10nf to ground for filtering. For wind direction i used 8.2K resistor pull up and a 10nf to ground (all in 3.3V circuit).

    Both are working very good! I am recommending these sensors to anyone wants to make a DIY weather station!

  • I noticed that wind strength meter makes two contacts (pulses) for each full circle. I was thinking maybe it should make a contact (pulse) for each circle.

    It can be checked even with the multimeter.

    Is that correct? Or mine is broken?

No public wish lists :(