rwizard

Member Since: September 25, 2006

Country: United States

Profile

Bio

carbon based biology

(expect more flippant answers like the one above - the need that some people have to chronicle their lives to complete strangers over the Internet is simply bizarre - get a real life and delete all those TwitSpaceFace accounts, ok? Unless, of course, you just like your potential employer being able to get answers to all those questions which it would be illegal for them to put on an employment application.)

Role

cinnamon with frosting (Sister Schubert’s frozen heat and eat)

Organizations

rarely, my desk is a mess

Spoken Languages

Curmudgeon, Mumble, Mutter, Curse, Invective, Excoriation, some English

Programming Languages

microcode, mind-machine interface, fat-finger, paper tape

Associations

new jersey and bad smells, new york and loud-mouthed nitwits, chocolate and cake, hot solder and intense pain

Universities

yes

Expertise

all

Interests

multitudinous

Websites

root

Publications

maxim

  • Let me second Member #679961’s objection to cloud based software development. It simply adds another layer of things to encumber the development process with no discernible benefit. I don’t get the fascination some people seem to have with moving essentially local tasks off of their computer and into the cloud. It is a bit like falling so in love with using wrenches that you start using them to drive nails. /rant mode off

  • Ah, so the end justifies the means? Nice.

    Until a court of law agrees that a product is violative of someone’s IP, it isn’t proven to be violative, and you are limited as to your options (negotiate, complain loudly, petition the courts for redress).

    Until a court of law sanctions a punitive course of action as a remedy for violative conduct, you had best not pursue it, as you are likely to be found liable for any harm that flows from your actions.

    Frustrating though it may be, you just don’t get to decide for yourself that something is violative, and then apply a remedy of your own choosing.

    And this, dear ones, is why Apple and Samsung don’t have ninjas assassinating one another’s senior management, although they may have both considered that option over a late night round of brandy and cigars. ;^)

  • You will find that disclaimer on all sorts of parts from all sorts of manufacturers in spite of the fact that they know their parts are routinely used in such settings. It is CYA boilerplate, and since there is frequently no mechanism to ensure that designers have been informed of it, nor a formal licensing process in place for many users of these parts, there is no sure way to know how any particular jurisdiction will view such a disclaimer. In other words, I wouldn’t rely on it - especially if I were committing an overt and legally dubious act which was intended to cause a failure. Judges and juries tend to take an uncharitable view of such behaviors.

  • Like most of you, I avoid knock-off chips to the best of my ability, but if we aren’t able to keep fake pharmaceuticals out of the prescription drug supply chain, then we aren’t likely to keep fake chips out of the electronics parts supply chain.

    However, to me this is a simple matter of taking illegitimate steps in addressing a legitimate issue. If FTDI wants to have their driver throw an exception when it sees what it believes to be a counterfeit chip, I think that is just fine. No reason they should support knock offs with their driver.

    But when they take the law into their own hands, and deliberately do harm to someone’s property by bricking the chip, they have crossed the line. I believe that this heavy handed approach will come back to bite them, and they wouldn’t want me on the jury if some innocent third party is injured by this puerile behavior.

    If they want to take a product using a counterfeit chip out of service LAWFULLY, then there are mechanisms for that. The fact that it may not be practical to apply those mechanisms in many cases does not give license for corporate vigilantism. I’m sure that if any substantive harm comes from this that a judge somewhere will be happy to educate their apparently clueless legal staff on this point.

    And what happens if the new driver kills a non-FTDI work alike chip which is not violative of FTDI’s intellectual property, or mistakenly kills an oddball production variant of an actual FTDI product?

    Just as I stopped buying Sony after they felt free to compromise my computer with a root kit, I will be avoiding FTDI like the plague from here on out.

    Anyone who signed off on this concept at FTDI needs to be “bricked” themselves.

  • At last, the perfect way to activate that prank self-electrocution Bermuda shorts project I’ve been working on… The Jewel Jangler 5000.

  • I just wait until election season and stick my boards in front of a politician giving a speech. Best hot air source I know. It works a lot better than a hairdryer, and I’m finally getting value for my tax dollars. ; )

  • “it is all of the nuances necessary to make and keep it safe for the person to whom it is connected”

    Ah, but that’s the beauty of self experimentation - the subject is expendable, and in the case of a fatality, the researcher is beyond the reach of any official inquiries. ; )

    The biggest issue I’ve seen with most home built ECGs is noise, but I certainly would not power one with anything but a low voltage battery supply. A “mains” supply might seem like a great convenience, that is, until the day the Chinese manufactured wall wart decides to couple 120vac across your chest.

    “The most frequent last words of a redneck are: ‘Hey y'all, watch this…’” - Jeff Foxworthy

  • I’m going to prove ear wax is an environmentally friendly alternative to flux if you’ll just hold still !

  • And then the big elf said they should connect the fire-tree oracle owls to the Internet so that everyone could benefit from their wisdom…

  • “(We’d probably need some pretty serious extension cords for the ensuing chase scene.)”

    I recommend the Andis Super AGR+ Vet Pak. Two rechargeable battery packs, and a 4x4 blade drive for more torque. A T-84 Ultraedge blade seems about right for the first pass, followed by a #40SS for that baby’s butt smooth finish. Note: Paste flux is not an appropriate after shave.

No public wish lists :(