New Product Friday: Photon RedBoard

This week we have a new Photon-based RedBoard and a handy cable.

Favorited Favorite 0

Welcome back everyone! This week we have a couple new products, including yet another Photon-based product to talk about. First, let's check out the video as to better spoil the surprise.

SparkFun Photon RedBoard

SparkFun Photon RedBoard

DEV-13321
$41.95
12

That's right, this week the SparkFun Photon RedBoard is shipping! Unfortunately, you'll have to wait until next week for the Photon SIK, but you can place your pre-order. The SparkFun Photon RedBoard is a WiFi/Microcontroller development board in the Arduino form-factor for the Photon. It’s easy to use, it’s powerful, and connected to the cloud. With the best support, potential, and performance the Photon RedBoard provides you with an IoT device with a powerful 120Mhz ARM Cortex M3 and built-in WiFi connectivity.

JST to Breadboard Jumper (3-pin)

JST to Breadboard Jumper (3-pin)

CAB-13685
$1.50

Every so often, we come across a product that makes us wonder how we've gone this long without it. This little jumper cable is one of those products. It's simple, elegant, and we marvel at how we've survived without it. On one end, it's a 3-pin JST connector that works with a lot of our sensors, LCDs, etc. On the other end are 3 male pins that go into a breadboard. It's that simple. Now you can plug your serial LCD into a breadboard without having to mash the bare wires into the holes.

That's it for this week. Be sure to check back next week for more new stuff. Thanks for reading and watching!


Comments 7 comments

  • I just keep thinking that $30-40 a board isn't going to get very many people into IoT. It's the same issue Xbee/Zigbee has always had; even the cheapest radios are still too expensive for people to really go nuts with them. For the price of this Photon Redboard I could buy a RaspPi 2B and a wifi dongle! If you want to drive the IoT to a new level, people need $3 radios.

    • I certainly agree that the RasPi is an awesome deal. But it's not the best choice for every kind of project. The stock Photon is only $19, already has wifi built-in, and is about 1/3 the size of a Pi. And if you are developing your own commercial product, you can bulk purchase the Photon's core module, which will be even smaller and cheaper.

      Yes, the ESP8266 is small and cheap, and they are getting easier to develop on thanks to community efforts. I love 'em! But I think you might find trade-offs if you start comparing speed, reliability, and memory. Again, it probably boils down to what is appropriate to your particular projects.

      Particle has built a great community for their platform. The forums are full of friendly and knowledgable folks. Their documentation is good. They have a ready-to-go cloud-based IDE and data platform, and the core of that is open source, so you can run your own local version of the cloud services.

      The value-add in the RedBoard here is in the Arduino form-factor, power regulator, JTAG header, etc. Is that worth the extra money over a standard Photon package? Maybe not to you, but maybe it is to somebody else who wants a convenient way to prototype using their existing Arduino shields before committing to the platform.

    • Keep in mind you've got a microcontroller on there too. Even with a $3 radio (like the ESP8266) you still need a microcontroller most of the time. In this case it is all rolled into one with IOT designed low power. Not bad for a mid ranged microcontroller. Though for cheap and easy the ESP8266 is a great option.

      • Arduino Pro Mini 3.3V x 25: $9 ESP8266 x 25: $6.50 Not sure what the Photon development ecosystem gains me over this setup that I'd pay SF 2X for? Look, I'm not trying to be a downer, I'm just not really seeing the value here, but obviously SF has because they are going all-in with Photon add-on boards, so maybe you can better explain what is so good about it?

        • In a lot of cases the Pro Mini and ESP8266 will be the better and/or cheaper option for your application. But not always. Two main advantages the Photon has over this setup are an ARM Cortex M3 (at 120MHz) giving you a lot more processing power than a Pro Mini, and FCC certification. Honestly, it is not so much that one option is better than the other, but that they are different options with different features (with only one of those features being price). If the Pro Mini and ESP8266 works fine in your application go for it. If you need faster speed, beefier process, FCC certification, etc., I'd take a look at the Photons (as well as other items on the market). Remember, more options is always good.

      • With the caveat that I have not done this myself, from what I read, it should be possible to reprogram the SOC on the ESP8266 to do fairly simple tasks (i.e., those that don't need many I/O pins) without need for another microcontroller. I'd expect it to be more difficult to do than, say, programming an Arduino, but for something like reporting a switch closure (or opening) (for instance, a door or window opening), or maybe talking to an I2C sensor, it could be pretty cost effective. I can also see having something like an Raspberry Pi talking to a whole flock of ESP8266s through a WiFi router, requesting (and interpreting) data from them.

        • Well, another US vendor has an ESP8266 breakout for just shy of $10 and they claim that it comes with a LUA interpreter baked in by default. But that can be overwritten with Arduino IDE once the core is installed to the IDE and one gets 1x 1.8V ADC and 9x 3.3V GPIO. Or, if you want to keep your business here with SparkFun, the ESP8266 based "Thing" claims to be compatible with Arduino IDE (again, probably after loading the core for the ESP8266 to the IDE).

          The Photon family will give you more ADCs which would be useful for some, and the cloud based IDE for OTA updates. That OTA update bit is probably really important if one plans on deploying many sensors for pushing updates. And, really this Photon redboard isn't targeted towards deployment situations, It's primarily a development board. SparkFun needs 1 more SKU in the Photon family IMHO, a plain photon w/o headers that has decent price-breaks for multiple ordering. When deploying multiple sensors, one doesn't need all those breadboards...

Related Posts

Recent Posts

Tags


All Tags